Discussion:
Last words about #31200 bug (for LacaK)
(too old to reply)
Dmitriy Pomerantsev
2017-01-09 10:41:06 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Since I can't post comment to closed bug and developer LacaK asked about "Btw how behaves Delphi in this case ? ", I think I can answer. Of course Delphi (Berlin 10.1) is returns "This is Some text".

P.S. This bug is duplicate of my #29770. I also found problem in Format() but I was trace this error to its source. And I just can’t understand why the "CP_NONE is invalid codepage" situation is excuse the string concatenation bug. *sigh*

Dmitriy Pomerantsev.
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-***@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-deve
LacaK
2017-01-09 15:29:26 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Hi,
as bug #31200 is marked as duplicate of #30622 you can put your findings
there.
On other side Jonas states, that "CP_NONE is always invalid as a dynamic
code page".
But if Delphi handles CP_NONE other than is now in FPC, then it should
be IMO reconsidered if align FPC with Delphi in this aspect.
It will be helpful to create tests for this case and report results for
Delphi and FPC.
-Laco.
Post by Dmitriy Pomerantsev
Since I can't post comment to closed bug and developer LacaK asked about "Btw how behaves Delphi in this case ? ", I think I can answer. Of course Delphi (Berlin 10.1) is returns "This is Some text".
P.S. This bug is duplicate of my #29770. I also found problem in Format() but I was trace this error to its source. And I just can’t understand why the "CP_NONE is invalid codepage" situation is excuse the string concatenation bug. *sigh*
Dmitriy Pomerantsev.
_______________________________________________
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-***@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinf

Loading...